<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">london-journal-of-humanities-and-social-science</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>London Journal of Humanities and Social Science</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn publication-format="print">2515-5784</issn>
<issn publication-format="electronic">2515-5792</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>JournalsPress</publisher-name></publisher>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://journalspress.com/journal-seo-export/jats/101274.xml" />
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">101274</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Unique Interpretation of Necessity and Freedom in the Philosophy of IBN Rushd based on the Rejection of the Opinions of his Contemporaries</article-title>
</title-group>
<volume>24</volume>
<issue>9</issue>
<fpage>25</fpage>
<lpage>30</lpage>
<abstract><p>The article delves into Ibn Rushd’s perspectives on the notions of freedom and necessity, as a prominent figure within the Eastern Peripatetic movement. His stance is elucidated through his rejection of the prevailing notions held by his peers. Within the medieval philosophical landscape, the discourse surrounding freedom and necessity often revolved around reconciling religious and philosophical ideologies. The article particularly highlights discussions on fate and volition.</p></abstract>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="http://journalspress.com/LJRHSS_Volume24/Unique-Interpretation-of-Necessity-and-Freedom-in-the-Philosophy-of-Ibn-Rushd-based-on-the-Rejection-of-the-Opinions-of-his-Contemporaries.pdf" />
<self-uri content-type="html" xlink:href="https://journalspress.com/unique-interpretation-of-necessity-and-freedom-in-the-philosophy-of-ibn-rushd-based-on-the-rejection-of-the-opinions-of-his-contemporaries/" />
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec>
<title>Full Text</title>
<p>The article delves into Ibn Rushd&#039;s perspectives on the notions of freedom and necessity, as a prominent figure within the Eastern Peripatetic movement. His stance is elucidated through his rejection of the prevailing notions held by his peers. Within the medieval philosophical landscape, the discourse surrounding freedom and necessity often revolved around reconciling religious and philosophical ideologies. The article particularly highlights discussions on fate and volition.</p>
</sec>
</body>
</article>