<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article article-type="research-article" xml:lang="English" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">journalspress</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>JournalsPress</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<publisher><publisher-name>JournalsPress</publisher-name></publisher>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://journalspress.com/journal-seo-export/jats/225581.xml" />
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">225581</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Onbi-Onwo Controversy: A Case for Surrogacy</article-title>
</title-group>
<abstract><p>Can a woman who has not experienced the inconveniences of pregnancy or go through the rigours of childbirth be identified as a mother? Can a woman be the mother of a child with whom she has no blood connection? These questions relate to what is considered the Ònbí-Oǹwò controversy in abánibímọ (surrogacy), among the Yoruba of Nigeria. These questions facilitate a revisit to the philosophical, cultural and scientific nature-nurture debate, but this study departs from the debate in that it is interested in making a case for the African woman, and more specifically, the Yoruba woman, who is perceived as agan (ridiculed/barren) because of her inability to conceive and procreate naturally; to engage alternate reproductive channels in having a child. Since, from the nature-nurture argument, we decipher that what makes up a socially functioning person is more than the germinal constituent. The philosophical tools of conceptual and critical analysis and reconstruction are used.  </p></abstract>
<self-uri content-type="html" xlink:href="https://journalspress.com/onbi-onwo-controversy-a-case-for-surrogacy/" />
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec>
<title>Full Text</title>
<p>Can a woman who has not experienced the inconveniences of pregnancy or go through the rigours of childbirth be identified as a mother? Can a woman be the mother of a child with whom she has no blood connection? These questions relate to what is considered the Ònbí-Oǹwò controversy in abánibímọ (surrogacy), among the Yoruba of Nigeria. These questions facilitate a revisit to the philosophical, cultural and scientific nature-nurture debate, but this study departs from the debate in that it is interested in making a case for the African woman, and more specifically, the Yoruba woman, who is perceived as agan (ridiculed/barren) because of her inability to conceive and procreate naturally; to engage alternate reproductive channels in having a child. Since, from the nature-nurture argument, we decipher that what makes up a socially functioning person is more than the germinal constituent. The philosophical tools of conceptual and critical analysis and reconstruction are used.</p>
</sec>
</body>
</article>