<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">london-journal-of-medical-and-health-research</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>London Journal of Medical and Health Research</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn publication-format="print">2515-5784</issn>
<issn publication-format="electronic">2515-5792</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>JournalsPress</publisher-name></publisher>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://journalspress.com/journal-seo-export/jats/65634.xml" />
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">65634</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Gla-100 Versus Gla-300 as Add on Basal Insulin in Basal Supported Oral Therapy &#8216; Real World Evidence From Eastern India</article-title>
</title-group>
<volume>20</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<fpage>11</fpage>
<lpage>16</lpage>
<abstract><p>Introduction: Glargine U300 (GLA-300) has a better pK/pD profile compared to Glargine U100 (GLA-100) resulting in a flatter action profile that fulfills the criterion of an ideal basal insulin . This retrospective real world study from Eastern India looks at the efficacy and safety of GLA-300 compared to GLA-100 used in insulin naive diabetic subjects presenting with oral anti diabetic (OAD) failure. Materials and Methods: Anthropometric data, blood pressure, glycaemic parameters,  creatinine, and  insulin dosage at baseline and after a treatment period of 12 weeks were taken up for analysis retrospectively. Results: Fasting, postprandial and HbA1C values were reduced significantly for both 54 patients in GLA-300 arm and 50 patients in GLA-100 arm. No change observed in anthropometric parameters, blood pressure and creatinine values between the two arms.  Incremental dose of +5.41±0.69 units for GLA-300 cohort was required in contrast to 10.66±1.04 units for GLA 100 cohort. There were 6 episodes of hypoglycaemia in the GLA-300 cohort and 11 in the GLA-100 cohort. Conclusion: GLA-300 appears to be a safer compared to GLA 100 as effective basal insulin.</p></abstract>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="http://journalspress.com/LJMHR_Volume20/1131_Gla-100-Versus-Gla-300-as-Add-on-Basal-Insulin-in-Basal-Supported-Oral-Therapy-Real-World-Evidence-From-Eastern-India.pdf" />
<self-uri content-type="html" xlink:href="https://journalspress.com/gla-100-versus-gla-300-as-add-on-basal-insulin-in-basal-supported-oral-therapy-real-world-evidence-from-eastern-india-2/" />
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec>
<title>Full Text</title>
<p>Introduction: Glargine U300 (GLA-300) has a better pK/pD profile compared to Glargine U100 (GLA-100) resulting in a flatter action profile that fulfills the criterion of an ideal basal insulin . This retrospective real world study from Eastern India looks at the efficacy and safety of GLA-300 compared to GLA-100 used in insulin naive diabetic subjects presenting with oral anti diabetic (OAD) failure.

Materials and Methods: Anthropometric data, blood pressure, glycaemic parameters,  creatinine, and  insulin dosage at baseline and after a treatment period of 12 weeks were taken up for analysis retrospectively.

Results: Fasting, postprandial and HbA1C values were reduced significantly for both 54 patients in GLA-300 arm and 50 patients in GLA-100 arm. No change observed in anthropometric parameters, blood pressure and creatinine values between the two arms.  Incremental dose of +5.41±0.69 units for GLA-300 cohort was required in contrast to 10.66±1.04 units for GLA 100 cohort. There were 6 episodes of hypoglycaemia in the GLA-300 cohort and 11 in the GLA-100 cohort.

Conclusion: GLA-300 appears to be a safer compared to GLA 100 as effective basal insulin.</p>
</sec>
</body>
</article>