<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">london-journal-of-humanities-and-social-science</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>London Journal of Humanities and Social Science</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn publication-format="print">2515-5784</issn>
<issn publication-format="electronic">2515-5792</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>JournalsPress</publisher-name></publisher>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://journalspress.com/journal-seo-export/jats/99646.xml" />
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">99646</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>&#8220;Exploring Light&#8217;s Bend: Gravity&#8217;s Influence Versus Refraction&#8221;</article-title>
</title-group>
<volume>24</volume>
<issue>5</issue>
<fpage>13</fpage>
<lpage>17</lpage>
<abstract><p>In this text, we discuss Einstein’s theory of relativity, which has been challenged several times but has only become more solid and confirmed with each attempt to invalidate it, even in contemporary times. In this article, we present one of the arguments that tries to refute the theory and explain why it is incorrect. We aim to present this simply so a wide audience can easily understand.</p></abstract>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="http://journalspress.com/LJRHSS_Volume24/Exploring-Lights-Bend-Gravitys-Influence-Versus-Refraction.pdf" />
<self-uri content-type="html" xlink:href="https://journalspress.com/light-refraction-experiment-the-effect-of-gravity-on-light-versus-refraction/" />
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec>
<title>Full Text</title>
<p>In this text, we discuss Einstein&#039;s theory of relativity, which has been challenged several times but has only become more solid and confirmed with each attempt to invalidate it, even in contemporary times. In this article, we present one of the arguments that tries to refute the theory and explain why it is incorrect. We aim to present this simply so a wide audience can easily understand.</p>
</sec>
</body>
</article>