Dimensions (Forms) and Processes of “Existence” — A Metaphysical Study of “Space–Time”

Human beings are a form of intelligent matter. We created language, writing, and numbers, forming knowledge. Beginning with matter, we have recognized and contemplated the world, forming systems of material philosophy and material science. We discovered atomic energy, understood DNA, and created robots, arriving at a world of energy and information. Humans have become their own “gods,” yet this "god" is confused by its own “knowledge.” As the pinnacle of scientific inquiry, quantum mechanics and relativity remain philosophically incompatible. Concepts such as "light speed" and "superluminal speed" have made "science" itself resemble “theology.” The problem lies in gaps within the philosophical foundation led by Aristotle’s Metaphysics, which historically guided all disciplines. The "soul" of science faces a bipolar contradiction. How can this be resolved?
Scientists have attempted to resolve contradictions between quantum mechanics and relativity using mathematics and physics, but where is the true answer?
Tracing the root is a philosophical issue. Aristotle’s cosmological system contains inherent “gaps.” Buddhist and Taoist cosmological systems can supplement one another in terms of understanding the origins of "space" and “time.” This constitutes the shared wisdom of humanity’s ancestors.
This paper uses scientific and technical knowledge to reinterpret Aristotle’s Physics and Metaphysics, employing materialistic dialectics to prove that "existence" (including matter) possesses perception;The physics principle of "light" creating the world is demonstrated. analyzing Aristotle’s “four causes,” summarizing the five major “origin–ontology” systems and the nature of "ontology"; resolving theoretical contradictions between quantum mechanics and relativity; and building a"Time and Space" philosophical framework for modern physics, providing foundations for future research on "information" and “energy.”
Using metaphysical principles, this paper analyzes contradictions in modern physics and distinguishes between the "philosophically sound" and "philosophically unsound" aspects of contemporary scientific knowledge.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Not applicable

The datasets used in this study are openly available at [repository link] and the source code is available on GitHub at [GitHub link].

This work did not receive any external funding.