Article in Press
This article is currently in the Just Accepted phase. The final published version may have formatting changes or additional corrections.
Abstract
This article develops a long-form research-stream argument from the supplied evidence packet. The central claim is that cCC* should be understood not as a free-standing conceptual invention, but as the proposed outcome of a staged research program that begins with a large Roy Morgan Values Segments evidence base and then reorganizes that empirical field through HYPERCUBE topology, AEIOUF dimensional ordering, and cCC*/NEWCON guardrails. The supplied pages show three things with unusual clarity. First, they identify an empirical base marked repeatedly at n = 327,119 and attributed to Roy Morgan Research. Second, they show that those data are not being left in raw market-segmentation form; they are redistributed into HYPERCUBE quadrants and four macro-zones repeatedly labelled becoming, bridging, building, and belonging. Third, they connect this remapping work to a visible publication stream associated with Benjamin and Levine on values segmentation, Benjamin and Bechervaise on entrepreneurship and behavioural differentiation, and Benjamin, Bitetto, and Bound on cCC*, AEIOUF, NEWCON, and behavioural economics. The article argues that the packet therefore supports a distinct LJHRSS research stream. In this stream, segmentation data provide the empirical field; HYPERCUBE provides a topological remapping architecture; AEIOUF provides the dimensional grammar; living-systems and mind-map pages provide mediating cognitive and relational pathways; entrepreneurial and turbulence pages provide the environmental conditioning; and cCC* names the coherencebearing and governance-relevant outcome of that reorganized field. The article concludes that the stream is sufficiently developed to justify a journal program of empirical, comparative, and longitudinal research into relational coherence under varying environmental conditions.
