The Crematory Key to the Greenhouse Effect with Volcanic Ashes: The Key of the Anthropocene Resides in Human Cremation. the Dangerous Loop That Remains to be Smashed to End Global Warming Definitively.

I. INTRODUCTION

The eruption of the Raikoke in June 2019 has been an interesting opportunity to observe the effects of crematory dumps in the deep sea trenches on volcanism. There is a clear effect of Soviet submarines around, and of tokamak-mash weapons from the end of the 1970s also dumped in, in the resulting tephra plume.

Crematory ovens have been used in Delta-3 class Soviet submarines (for instance) for the upward kick to break the ice, with also the loss of mass converted into energy for theoretically perfect icebreak ${}^1$, with certainly a downward throw of the crematory matter for maximal "Archimedes push" icebreak. The USSR also used frequently crematory power in siloing pattern with tunnel retchlags and nitrogen injection on the victims getting out of the uranium tunnel mine just to stumble immediately into the tunnel, where nitrogen was injected before neutron work, for the making of primitive ICBMs with a crematory nuclear propulsion ${}^2$. Crematory systems were also common in Gorbachev-era artillery and there is also an effect of the Earth's spin and flow of crematory sludge from the Alaska (both civilian and military activities) and of the alpha emitters in the oil of the Exxon Valdez oil spill altogether.

The study of the 20 ${}^{th}$ Century list of major volcanic eruptions shows that there is a more global pattern related to the dumping of crematory matter into lakes, rivers and sea trenches, after local discovery of the relative inefficiency versus clean nuclear fuels. It is clear by observing a picture of the local area of the Cerro Azul that it was the site of the first dumping of crematory ashes, after understanding of the weakness by the engineers of the Spanish Armed Forces who later followed in the Spanish Civil War Francisco Franco. This is followed, the year after, by the Bezymianny eruption, which clearly explains the later massive purges within the Red Army by Joseph Stalin, and his refusal to give to support the opponents to Francisco Franco in Spain.

The St Helens eruption in 1980 has clearly been boosted by a local understanding of the weakness of crematory oven ashes, perhaps in the China Lake military base, and subsequent river dumping. It is followed 2 years after by harmonization in Mexico explaining the intensity of the El Chichon eruption. The story of the Pinatubo 1991 eruption is clearly and definitively related to immediate pre-war efforts against Communist China following the quasi fall of the USSR, with the project of a nuclear reactor build onto the sleeping volcano, in particular, for supporting these future war efforts, explaining in particular the volcanic eruption – the light grey colour of the tephra column of the Pinatubo does not show significant levels of crematory contamination. The Eyjafjallajokull eruption however has to be linked to the economic crisis of Iceland starting from 2008, and elimination of crematory power cars after fall of demand (in relation to the earlier "bank overproduction" – in a small island-country in particular banking can be expected to be related to the basic model of the "banker seating on the stock of gold and silver", but in this case pressurizing a crematory system, so the economic crisis leads to excess "anthropic" [1] nuclear stocks).

These results, when brought together with intensity of outside use of crematory weapons, explain perfectly the essential of the global land and ocean temperature anomalies of the NOAA on the 20 ${}^{th}$ Century. There is a visible effect of the massive use of crematory oven shells during WW2 until 1944, the end of rafles and the liberation of the extermination camps allows the downfall of temperatures from 1945. There is a subsequent effect, certainly, of the transfer of the crematory technology in the civilian sector, where the limited heat-up related to the non-inflammability of most human corpses is frequently used for "cold" energy, together with a high disease risk, that has to be considered as the founder of the 1945-1976 consensus with a flat temperature curve and a strong public healthcare system to compensate.

This "coldness" of crematory energy is a lying concept as demonstrated by the subsequent climate effects of the volcanic tephras released when subduction has taken in the crematory ashes. The crematory ashes create a particularly thick veil that is the true "greenhouse effect" (already described in $[2]$ ) and the description above allows to show how the crematory component is a particularly strong trigger of subsequent global warming under tephras carrying it. The crematory component is a last-call result of a pattern itself immediately costly for the climate, since cremation demands heating and immediately (or through energy costs related for setting up of the particular infrastructure) that heating is released in the environment as well, causing more warming. One example at the beginning of the Ukraine War allowed to show that, with a large series of BTR-80s of the Ukrainian Army destroyed by Russian strikes; a few days after temperatures fell down and snow came back on the Alps, allowing to ski again (in spite of a contamination with crematory plutonium following) ${}^3$.

A third element has to be taken into account as well, related to the low levels of fission in a crematory weapon. Although it may seem protective of the warming levels in a statistical computation related to immediate heat release, in a bomb format the heat release is intrinsically related to military efficiency, and low fission levels mean perdition in nature of most of the alpha emitters in addition to military defeat – since it is a result of the low transmutation (plutogenization) levels in the crematory phase. Their later alpha decay will contribute to support global warming, especially as solar neutrons progressively transmutate them and then fission them, meaning simply on the very long term a delayed and much less energy-efficient "delivery of the energy" whose characteristics are that it contributes much more to climate change and much less to the military purpose theoretically adjudicated. This is a result of the decision to do two things with a simple tool (the bomb), i.e. social/ethnic purge (by adopting the crematory, or mash, production system) and military strike altogether, causing long-term impossibility (cf. Lipsey-Lancaster paradox – the Avro-Manchester was a Western example of plane with a crematory propulsion, losses during WW2 testify of the neutron efficiency statistics theorems already at the basis of the first article written on the subject [3], with 63% of losses, in relation to the 33% usual yield of crematory oven power versus clean power, augmented by solar neutrons. More than 97% of cancers were estimated to be related to alpha emitters in [4]. The remaining can be associated to UVs [5] and solar neutrons. The crematory rate of plutogenization in the Avro Manchester was obviously augmented by solar neutrons and also by UVs because they spinning the shuriken atoms frequently laterally (because of dawn raids) favorizing neutron capture, explaining entirely the survival rate of these planes. The Lipsey-Lancaster paradox demonstrates the imperative to not think of civilian or military nuclear power with other aims also in aims to definitively escape long-term failure).

All of these factors come together to explain climate curves in a definitive and imperative way. Human action has to be dragooned in a way prohibiting definitively all crematory activities and most mash activities as well (except when correctly inserted within human rights). Pyroprocessing in particular denominates the heat-up of nuclear systems in ways accelerating artificially neutron transfer, certainly associated to plutogenization of human ashes resulting in explosions particularly dense in climate-warming materials, through direct plumes of the explosions or through later volcanic redistribution. Following on earlier results of the author communicated early to health authorities regarding crematory and mash and diseases (more recently published in $[6]$ ), the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists recently attempted to make the argument against crematory methods in a silent way by condemning pyroprocessing and strongly discouraging the regarding of plutonium as long term source of pollution at the same time $[7]$, implicitly recognizing somehow the value of clean plutonium weapons. The article also points to the Argonne Laboratory's May 2001 claim to an energy policy review group led by Vice-President Dick Cheney of the development of a "proliferation-resistant" pyroprocessing retreatment of spent fuel, which certainly incited to the later use of depleted uranium weapons in developing countries while it is likely the result of a misunderstanding with woodfire heat-up of depleted uranium into argon in a cistern without any anthropic component actually developed in Argonne. Hydrogen can be used for pyroprocessing as well as all types of woods but banning "pyroprocessing" creates a long-term failure belonging to the Lipsey-Lancaster paradox since the secondary objective of not explaining why (by avoiding to mention crematory processes in the decision) creates the long-term failure (because not all pyroprocessing is crematory or mash).

Wind power energy has been shown to be directly produced by the generation of specific antigravitons, through the pressurization of crematory ashes ${}^4$, after the early experiments that led to the Holodomor in the Ukraine under guidance of Ordhzhonikidze, Kondratyuk and Khrushchev, where simple proton pressure in graves was the pattern leading to a particularly low wind energy produced by each corpse, combined with wind farm projects rising up to 24 MW (in a context where the population was hence starved to death to feed the wind farm projects). Crematory ash cans are usually now inserted directly near the turbine behind particular metals (rare earths) whose properties are fit for this "anthropic" nuclear power (or crematory power systems set up near the windfarms), and they explain the particular dirtiness of the wind turbine fires, along with the fallout under them, while their crematory antigravitons explain the "bird strike" pattern observed early [8]. The use of the wind power for enforced disappearances, private justice, stimulates its support by a part of the population enticed by the apparent environmental respectability of the process. Underwater crematory power has also developed, especially after the first publication on crematory anti gravitons [9], causing oceanwater pollution in very large ponds of anthropic nuclear waste drifting to the seashore, after underwater crematory tokamaks were destroyed by their antigravitons. Storms are among the immediate results of these far-from-prying-eyes crematory nuclear accidents, with abnormally hot and stormy days resulting.

The banning of crematory, tokamak-mash, zyklon-chlorine patterns (with the case of zyklon-c lampposts to be linked to photons from lights in non-energy-efficient systems in $[2]$ ) altogether with all other hyphenated-zyklons (sulfur, nitrogen, fluor, bromide etc), has to be immediate and definitive. A tolerance for sodium-mash in military warheads is useful because sodium presence in the resulting warhead allows a primitive but efficient later soil depollution through rapid natural plutogenization of the $D{U}^5$, with solar and geophysical neutrons, although antigraviton capture of the DU is more efficient and without associated change of the colour of the environment. Pedagogy to the public on the clearly observable phenomenae of DNA/RNA transfer effects from crematory contamination fallout intake restituting literally through the overall population the characteristics, phenotypes, genotypes, of the social/ethnic groups eliminated in the crematory systems, should further discourage pogroming behaviour and avoid further weather heat-up but it is important to remind how weather heat-up initially benefits the owners of crematory systems (be them for propulsion or warheads), since it fastens further plutogenization within, without any pyroprocessing. This is why the "global warming comes from $C{O}_2/C{H}_4$ emissions" discourse creates a never-ending cycle bringing the doomsday clock of mass epidemies, hurricanes and harvest destructions from crematory nuclear fallout forward ${}^6$, as on the long term it does not ensure the correct education and hence maintains the possibility of total obliteration of the compensative measures by radicals. There is a supplementary effect from the maintaining of crematory systems around resulting from the collective hypocrisy, with the brain headaches resulting from antigravitons associated to the crematory activities (especially zyklon-C but clearly already linked to several of the autistic symptoms observed by Leo Kanner in his first article $[10]$ – the Avro Manchester being one example of why the discovery of autism happened both in the West and later in nazified Austria, in relation to hand flaps, altogether with the case already established in [11]. Hans Asperger's picture in 1940 shows influence of the Avro-Manchester antigravitons. Nazi crematory strikes from the product of the extermination camps around Austria by 1944 contributed directly to his findings and Hans Asperger's actually whispers that at the beginning of his 1943/1944 article ("Weise Gezeigt [...] recht nebulose") causing more disruption of the learning processes and fostering more staggering into the underperforming system of the "miracles of solar neutrons and of summer heat" accelerated by the anthropocene, i.e. by all the consequences of crematory activities on global temperatures described in this article, leading to a pseudo-self-sustaining cycle (totally self-sustaining with insurances fully repaying the costs of hurricanes and of pandemies).

The current inflationary curve is wholly a consequence of that and the replacement of money by alpha emitters in a weighted way is a sure way to responsibilize individual behaviour and encourage more savvy practices that will immediately in turn benefit the environment wholly, with currency needs being a more sure incentive to clean the environment than any law or directive or federal decree. The tolerance to sodium-mash should not extend to propulsion systems, where it presents a viral risk, like all other crematory systems $[6]$. This is related to the fact that in warheads rapidly fired the virus does not have time to demultiply. This is demonstrated by the fact that hijacking of cells by dormant viruses is associated to copies of the genetic material of the virus and not to its own viral proteins $[12]$. Sodium-mash warheads done with saltwater are the safest non-clean weapons. Even iodine-bromide in crematory was demonstrated to cause diseases, through a study of wall impacts of crematory iodo-bromide bullets made by the French Milice $[13]$. The rediscovery of leisure should allow some civil servants earlier involved in the control of CO2 emissions to retrieve their links with nature instead of considering that individual use of alpha emitters in newly designed nuclear motors are worth controlling – while individual instinct to save resources and respect of the environment naturally come together and that their wage as civil servants creates environmental costs which they simply compensate through their control activity, except if they solely focus on monitoring industries that have an interest in a non-fully clean environment for reasons of rapid selling.