IntelliPaper
Abstract
he main purpose of this paper is to contrast the realizations of elements – processes, participant roles and circumstances in the English and Myanmar transitivity configurations following the network developed within the framework of Systemic Functional Linguistics. It is found that: English and Myanmar show similarity in the realizations of processes as verbal groups, participant roles as nominal groups, nominalization, adverbial groups, prepositional phrases, embedded clauses, and circumstances as nominal groups, adverbial groups, or prepositional phrases. However, they differ in that processes are also realized by copulas and participant roles by adjective/adjective groups in English, while processes are also realized by compound verbs, reduplicated verbs, or attributive verbs and circumstances by qualifying reduplicated adverbs or embedded clauses in Myanmar. The findings are rooted in the functional and typological prominences of the two languages, which may further shed light on a new perspective on the research of transitivity system for Systemic Functional Linguistics. This study also makes an important contribution to further studies of contrasting the realizations of elements in the transitivity configurations of Myanmar and other languages.
Explore Digital Article Text
Article file ID not found.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
Not applicable
Data Availability
The datasets used in this study are openly available at [repository link] and the source code is available on GitHub at [GitHub link].
Funding
This work did not receive any external funding.