Examination of the Accuracy of the Quantitative of Kit for Determination of Zinc Concentration in Seminal Fluid

London Journal of Medical Research
Volume | Issue | Compilation
Authored by Nguyen Thi Trang , Bui Bich Mai, Le Thi Minh Phuong, Nguyen Hoang, Nguyen Ngoc Mai, Tran Trung Duc, Nguyen Trung Hieu
Classification: NLMC Code- WJ 750
Keywords: male infertility, seminal zinc, seminogram, spectrophotometric method.
Language: English
               

Examination of the Accuracy of the Quantitative of kit for Determination of Zinc Concentration in Seminal Fluid

Bui Bich Maiα, Le Thi Minh Phuongσ, Nguyen Hoangρ, Nguyen Ngoc MaiѠ, Tran Trung Duc¥,, Nguyen Trung Hieu§, &  Nguyen Thi Trangχ

____________________________________________

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The role of zinc is critical to reproduction potential. Seminal zinc is thought to be derived almost exclusively from prostatic secretions. Sperm motility is significantly influenced by zinc. Zinc deficiency has been linked with male sterility and subfertility.

Materials and Methods: The semen samples were obtained from 300 male partners of infertile couples who attended the Department Biomedical and Genetics of the Hanoi medical university within the age 18-50 years and semen samples were analyzed for the routine seminal parameters. Routine semen analysis was performed according to WHO 2010 guidelines. After the semen analysis, samples were centrifuged at 1500 x g for 10min and zinc and fructose concentrations assayed from the supernatant (i.e. seminal plasma). Zinc concentration was assessed using spectrophotometry (5- Br- PAPS method) - direct colorimetric test without deproteinization of the sample. At pH 8.6, in a buffered media, zinc reacts with specific complexing 5-Br-PAPS form a stable color compound.

Results: Linear regression model: y = 0.0666x + 1.2026 with correlation coefficient r = 0.9956. The calibration function: y = 0.9977x with R2 = 0.9995. Repeatability: SD = 0.004 and coefficient of variation CV% = 0.27% <5%; Intermediate precision: standard deviation is SD = 0.01, coefficient of variation is CV% = 0.64% <5%; trueness: tex= 2,076 <tt = 2.262. Specificity was 100% and 100% sensitivity at 64x dilution. Specificity was 100 % and 99,05 % sensitivity. Significant correlation between the two methods with r=0,975, p<0,001; average difference between the two methods is 0,0002 (nearly 0).

Conclusion: Complete the kit for determination of zinc concentration in semen by colorimetric method. 

Keywords: male infertility, seminal zinc, semino- gram, spectrophotometric method.

Authorασχ: Hanoi Medical University

ρѠ : Hanoi - Amsterdam Highschool for the Gifted

¥§ : HUS High School for Gifted Students, Vietnam

  1. INTRODUCTION

Infertility is defined as the failure of a couple to achieve a pregnancy after at least one year of frequent unprotected intercourse [1,2]. It has been reported that the male partner contributes in 40% of the cases of infertility. Globally, the incidence of fertility is estimated to be about 13-18% [3]. Due to the various reasons caused male infertility, it is essential to identify appropriate diagnosis methods to detect them.

There are many tests that have been applied for several decades such as semen analysis, genetic tests and hormones methods. Recently, some of biochemical markers including zinc and fructose are becoming significant implications for diagnosing the cause in male infertility [4].

They have thus been established as good indicators of human male fertility. An understanding of the factors affecting these characteristics is critical to proper understanding of the mechanisms underlying male infertility [5,6] Zinc is another factor essential for male reproductive system. Deficiency of zinc in the reproductive system causes hypogonadism and gonadal hypo function [7,8]. Many studies have shown that zinc plays an important role in the normal development of testicles, prostate and sperm motility [9,10]. However, in Vietnam, test for determination of concertation of zinc in seminal plasma was be put into use in 2013 at the Hanoi Medical University Hospital, and is increasingly popular in clinics. The need to use test kits to quantify fructose in semen is increasing. However, in Vietnam there are currently no units or establishments that produce this test. Therefore, all tests must be imported from abroad with many intermediate costs increasing the cost of the test many times.

  1. MATERIALS AND METHOD

2.1  Objects

Study subjects are semen samples of male patients who come for examination, counseling and testing semen at the Genetic counseling center and the Urology and Urology Clinic, Hanoi Medical University Hospital from June, 2017 to March, 2018. The participants of the study were asked to produce sperm by masturbation and collected in sterile container with period of 2-5 days of intercourse abstinence. Sperm should be analyzed within 2 hours after produced. Routine semen analysis was performed according to WHO 2010 guidelines.

The formula for a sample size for a descriptive study by S.K.Luanga and Lemeshow [11]:

Where: 1- α / 2 = 0.95; ε = 0.10; p = 95% (reference process precision). n = number of experiments required, calculated by 21, we take a round of 30.

To calculate the sample size to determine sensitivity, specificity and equivalence:

Z ( /2): confidence factor (with 95% confidence, Z = 1.96).

According to Zahoor Ahmed and colleagues in 2010, the percentage of men with low fructose concentrations in the azoospermia and oligo- spermia groups was p = 25% [12]. ε: is 0.2; n = 1.962 x 0.25 x (1 - 0.25): (0.2 x 0.25) 2 = 147, rounded to 150.

We took the sample size of 300 to increase the accuracy. On the same sample of semen, we measured fructose concentrations twice methods: once with the IVD kit (Fructose test, Fertilpro company, Belgium) and once with the improving kit. The difference between the two methods was based on Pearson correlation, T-test and Bland-Altman plot.

2.2.1 Selection criteria

Criteria for selecting subjects: semen samples from male patients of reproductive age from 18 to 50 years without acute illness and consent to participate in the study.

2.1.2 Exclusion criteria

- Men with genital cancers.

- Men with HIV, syphilis, gonorrhea.

- Men are suffering from acute illness, mental illness.

- The person disagrees with the study.

  1. METHOD

3.1  Principle of the Method

Direct colorimetric test without deproteinization of the sample. End point increase. At pH 8.6, in a buffered media, zinc reacts with the specific complexing 5-BrPAPS, forms a stable colored complex. The color intensity is proportional to the amount of zinc present in the sample.

Measuring the concentration of zinc:

Materials:

Buffer A: Sodium bicarbonate (200mmol/l), Sodium citrate (170mmol/l), Dimethylglyoxim e(4mmol/l),TritonX100(1%),5-Br-PAPS(0,08mmol/l). Buffer B: Salicyaldoxime (2,9mmol/l).  Working buffer, pH-8.6 (C): 4A:1B.

  • Zinc standard (Merk)
  • Zinc color 5-Br PAPS (Spinreac, Spain)

The procedure for fructose quantitative testing in semen:

The steps are as follows:

Step 1: Semen sample is centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 10 minutes. This step is used to settle the sperm cell down to the bottom and only take the top of the semen containing the fructose for testing, as the sperm is not used in the test.

         Step 2: Give 200 μl of supernatant to 200 μl TCA 370μmol/L , mix well, centrifuge at 10000 rpm for 10 minutes. This step is used to remove the protein (after centrifugation, the protein will be precipitated, only recover supernatant which zinc).

Step 3: Take 100 μl of supernatant to working buffer  (4A:1B). Incubate at room temperature for 5 minutes.

Step 4: Measure optical density (OD) at 530nm wavelength, 1cm curvature. For control, 100 μl of distilled water was substituted for semen. The color of the solution remained unchanged within 1 hour.  [Zn] µmol/l = (OD sample/OD blank) x C zinc standard (µmol/l).

The sensitivity and specificity are calculated according to the formula:

The sensitivity (%) =   x 100%

The specificity (%) =  x 100%

3.2  Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 16.0. The means were compared using student t test. The statistical tests were considered to be significant at the p≤0.05 level.

3.3  Ethical considerations

Ethical approval to conduct the study was sought from the Hanoi Medical University. Permission to use data from the Hanoi Medical University Hospital was sought from the hospital authority. All the information from the database was kept under strict confidentiality.
No names were recorded.

  1. RESULT

4.1 Construction of linear regression equations and Calibration function

4.1.1 Linear regression equations

The color intensity of the mixture is proportional to the concentration of zinc in the seminal plasma. The linear regression equation was used to describe the dependence between zinc concentrations in seminal plasma and measured photometer densities.

Figure 3.1:  Linear regression Equations                Figure 3.2:  Calibration Curve

The regression equation y = 0.0666x + 1.2026; The correlation coefficient r = 0.9956.

  • Calibration function

The calibration function is constructed with the standard zinc concentration threshold of 0; 0.5; 1; 1,5; 2 g / l, we measured the OD density corresponding to each standard fructose concentration threshold according to the completed test procedure and established the calibration curve as Fig.3.2.

Calculation function equation is y = 0.9977x; Corollary R2 = 0.9995.

3.2. Determining the accuracy of the kit

Measurement

Zinc standard concentration (mmol/L)

Repeatability

Intermediate precision

Trueness

OD

  The Zinc concentration was measured (mmol/L)

Zinc concentrations measured by different technicians (mmol/L)

OD

Technicians 1

Technicians 2

Technicians 3

1

1,53

1,352

1,527

1,559

1,523

1,530

1,332

2

1,53

1,354

1,529

1,524

1,527

1,524

1,335

3

1,53

1,358

1,533

1,504

1,524

1,534

1,333

4

1,53

1,352

1,527

1,532

1,525

1,526

1,334

5

1,53

1,36

1,536

1,513

1,532

1,534

1,340

6

1,53

1,362

1,538

1,537

1,533

1,524

1,341

7

1,53

1,356

1,531

1,527

1,536

1,534

1,343

8

1,53

1,351

1,525

1,514

1,530

1,529

1,338

9

1,53

1,353

1,528

1,520

1,536

1,532

1,343

10

1,53

1,356

1,531

1,544

1,528

1,536

1,336

SD

0,004

0,01

Tex = 2,076

The repeatability: From the results in the table above, we calculated the standard deviation of SD = 0.004 and the coefficient of variation CV% = 0.27. The variation coefficient of the self-mixing kit is within the allowable limits (CV% <5%).

The intermediate precision: With the results obtained from the table above, we obtained the standard deviation of SD = 0.01, so the coefficient of variation was CV% = 0.64%. The coefficient of variation lies within the CV% <5% limit.

The trueness: With the above results, we calculate tex = 2.076. In addition, through the table look at tt = 2,262; tex < tt so we achieves testing standards.

4.3. The sensitivity and specificity

4.3.1  The sensitivity and specificity

Table 3.1:  Statistics of Zinc Quantitative Results in 3 Groups of Patients

Zinc concentration

The self-mixing kit

Commerial kit

Group 1(Control group)

Below normal concentration

43

43

Normal

57

57

Group 2 (Group with some abnormal seminal indexes)

Below normal concentration

40

38

Normal

60

62

Group 3 (Azoospermia group)

Below normal concentration

73

73

Normal

27

27

Table 3.2:  Index of Indicators to Calculate the Sensitivity and Specificity

                

True Positive

FalsePositive

True Negative

FalseNegative

Group 1

57

0

43

0

Group 2

60

0

38

2

Group 3

27

0

73

0

Total

208

0

90

2

Sensitivity

99,05 %

Specificity

100 %

Comment:

  • True negative: Below normal zinc concentrtion when tested by both kits.
  • False negative: Below normal zinc concentration when tested by the self-mixing kit, above normal zinc concentration when tested by the commercial kit.
  • True positive: Normal zinc concentration when tested with both kits.
  • False positive: Normal zinc concentration when tested by self-mixing kit, below normal zinc concentration when tested by commercial kit.

The sensitivity and specificity are calculated according to the formula:

Sensitivity = True positive/True positive+False negative x 100%

Specificity = True negative/True negative + False positive x 100 %

The sensitivity of the self-mixing kit is 99.05% and the specificity of the self-mixing kit is 100%

3.2. Assessing the capability of detecting the concentration of zinc between the self-mixing kit and the commercial standard kit

  • The results of assessing the capability of detecting the concentration of zinc between the self-mixing kit and the commercial standard kit (The list of 300 patients tested is included in the appendix)
  • The Pearson test results shows strong correlation between the concentration of zinc measured by the two kits with r=0,975 (0,983-0,995), p<0,001.

Figure 3.1:  Bland – Altman diagram assess the capability of detecting zinc concentration between the self-mixing kit and the commercial standard kit.  

Comment: The self-mixing kit has a tendency of giving higher results than the commercial standard kit. The difference between the 2 methods of detection is random ( the value points are dispersed and follow no pattern) and the error deviation is not connected to the zinc quantification results.

The mean difference difference between the two methods was very small (0.0002) close to 0, with the standard deviation = 4.94%. Most cases were within ± 1.96 standard deviations.

V.    DISCUSSION

Linear regression equation

The concentration of zinc in semen can be detected with the – method with  5-BR-PAPS. At suitable pH levels, zinc reacts with 5-Br-PAPS, creating a chelate with stable colors. The darkness of the mixture’s color is proportional to the quantity of zinc in semen. The concentration of zinc can be measured by the optical density of this mixture.

We proceed to measure the optical density 2 times in the sequence 1,0 ; 1,5 ; 2,0 ; 2,5 ; 3,0 ; 3,5 ; 4,0 mmol/l, getting the average. Use Ms-Exel to draw the linear line.

Linear regression equation is y = 0,0666x + 1,2026, zinc concentration is the independent variables, x and optical density is the dependent variable, y.

Correlation coefficient r = 0,9956, and 0,995 < r < 1, indicates a strong positive relationship between zinc concentration and optical density.

  • About construction of calibration function 

When mixing chemicals, due to subjective or objective reasons, there may be error factors that led to different results between the 2 tests. In this kit, to minimize those factors, to ensure result stability between the  tests, each time we mixed chemicals, we proceeded to build the calibration function.

Phương trình hàm hiệu chuẩn là y = 0,9977x, hệ số tương quan R2 = 0,9995. Such as computational, quantitative results when using chemical batch after need with coefficient 1, meaning that no additional coefficients. It can be seen between the different batches of chemical test no significant difference in the test results.

The calibration function equation y = 0,9977x, correlation coefficients R2 = 0,9995

    -About the accuracy

In trials, especially quantitative testing, there are a number of error factors that affect the test, leading to inaccurate results. Therefore, in order to control these confounding factors, it is necessary to use the precision. Precision results only depend on the random error factor that is not related to the actual result of the sample. The lower precision the standard deviation, the greater the variance.

    Precision is based on three parameters: the repeatability, the intermediate precision and the reproducibility. In this study, we only performed experiments that calculated the repeatability and the intermediate precision because there is no equivalent laboratory, it is not possible to calculate the reproducibility.

In this study, our self- mixture kit has a repeatability with a CV% coefficient of 0.27%, so that the coefficient of variation does not exceed 5% indicates that satisfies the requirements of the analysis.

When calculating the intermediate, we obtained the coefficient of variation CV% = 0,64%. This coefficient of variation is also valid for not more than 5%. And so, the process also meets the requirements of the analysis.

Thus, when the effect of random error elements is the same, the concentration measured under different conditions has a tolerable range.

  •    About the trueness

The trueness of the method shows that the degree of proximity between the result obtained and the actual value or accepted value is true (μ).

By experimentally testing the trueness, the result we obtained is tex = 2.076. Also, when looking at the table, the tt value obtained is 2.262. This means that tex < tt, and the concentration of fructose measured from this method has the same effect as the actual concentration of the sample. The process achieves the required accuracy of an analysis.

Discussion

A good test kit should have high sensitivity and specificity, which means that the kit has low false positives and false negatives. These are two important criteria for evaluating the quality of a analysis kit.

Our kit achieves a specificity of 100%  and the sensitivity is 100%. It is therefore possible to use this kit to quantify fructose in semen with high reliability.

To reassert the accuracy of our self-mixing kit, we continue to compare the results obtained by our kit with those of the standard kit.

Results showed that there were significant correlations between the two methods (r = 0.975; p <0.001), the mean difference between the two methods was 0.0002, equivalent to 4.94%. This difference was not statistically significant.

The chart shows that the difference is completely random and independent from the standard scale.

In our kit, we transform proteins using TCA 370 mmol/l. TCA is a non-poisonous, common, and easy to purchase acid. Transforming proteins before mixing them with color indicators limits the possibility of proteins reacting to the color indicator and produce a mixture of inaccurate color. In this way, the accuracy of obtained results is considerably improved.

Moreover, our self-mixture test kit uses only simple, low cost, common, easy-to-buy, and less chemicals than commercial kits.  The IVD kit we use in this study is the Fructose Test (Belgium), which is being used widely to measure fructose in semen in laboratories today. This kit also follows the principle of colorimetric method, but indol is used as an expensive chemical that is difficult to buy in Vietnam and requires the use of a color rendering stopper. In addition, the kit must be imported from abroad, through many intermediate stages leading to the cost of testing high. This means that our kit is more suitable for use in Vietnam, where determination of zinc concentration in seminal fluid is in high demand, yet the average annual income remains only average.

With the achieved advancements, we hope our kit can soon be subject of quantity production, replacing current imported kits in health institutions.

However, in this study, we have only tested the kit on laboratory-scale. Assessment on industrial scale is fundamental for the kit to become subject of quantity production.

  1. CONCLUSION

Successfully complete the procedure to create the zinc quatification kit using  colorimetric method.

Calibration function: y = 0,9977x; Correlation coefficients R2 = 0,9995

  • Accurancy

Repeatability: SD = 0,004, coefficient of variation CV% = 0,27% < 5%

Intermediate precision: SD = 0,01, Coefficient of variation CV% = 0,64% < 5% Trueness: ttn = 2,076 < tc = 2,262.

The sensitivity of the self-mixing kit is 99,05% and the specificity of the self-mixing kit is 100%

The results show strong correlation between the 2 methods (r=0,975; p<0,001), the average difference between the kits is 0,0002 , equivalent to 4.94%.  The diference has no statistical significance. Most cases were within ± 1.96 standard deviations.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to take this opportunity to extend my sincere thanks to Ministry of Health for providing financial support for the study. We also are grateful for the technical support of the Hanoi Medical University Hospital for the assay of the seminal fructose concentration.

Conflict of interest
Author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  1. WHO Laboratory manual for the Examination and processing of human semen. 5th edn. Geneva: WHO Press; 2010.
  2. Swerdloff RS, Wang C. The testis and male sexual function. 22nd ed. In:
    Goldman L, Ausiello D, editors.
    Cecil Textbook of Medicine. Philadelphia (PA): Saunders Publisher; 2004:1472‒1483.
  3. Doshi H, Heana O, Hemali T. Zinc levels in seminal plasma and its relationship with seminal characteristics. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India. 2008;58:152‒155.
  4. Agarwal A, Bragais FM, Sabanegh E. Assessing sperm function. Urol Clin North Am. 2008;35(2):157–171.
  5. Cooper TG. WHO laboratory manual for the Examination and processing of human semen. 5th edn. Bern: WHO Press; 2010:1–157.
  6. Lewis Jones DI, Aird IA, Biljan MM, et al. Effects of sperm activity on zinc and fructose concentrations in seminal plasma. Human Reproduction. 1996;11(11):2465–2467.
  7. Sandstead HH, Prasad AS, Schulert AR, et al. Human zinc defciency, endocrine manifestations and response to treatment. Am J Clin Nutr. 1967;20(5):422‒442.
  8. Omu AE, Dashti H, Othman S Al. Treatment of asthenozoospermic with zinc sulphate: andrological, immunological and obstetric outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol.1998;79(2):179‒184.
  9. Biswas S, Ferguson KM, Stedronska J, et al. Fructose and hormone levels in semen: their correlations with sperm counts and motility. Fertil Steril. 1978;2(30):200‒204.
  10. Saleh BOM, Hussain NK, Majid AY, et al. Status of Zinc and Copper Concentrations in Seminal Plasma of Male Infertility and Their Correlation with Various Sperm Parameters. The Iraqi postgraduate medical journal. 2008;7(1):76‒80.
  11. S.K.Luanga, Lemeshow. Sample size determination in health studies A practical manual.
  12. Zahoor Ahmed et al. (2010). Seminal fructose in various classes of infertile patients Pak J   Physiol 2010;6(1)



author

For Authors

Author Membership provide access to scientific innovation, next generation tools, access to conferences/seminars
/symposiums/webinars, networking opportunities, and privileged benefits.
Authors may submit research manuscript or paper without being an existing member of LJP. Once a non-member author submits a research paper he/she becomes a part of "Provisional Author Membership".

Know more

institutes

For Institutions

Society flourish when two institutions come together." Organizations, research institutes, and universities can join LJP Subscription membership or privileged "Fellow Membership" membership facilitating researchers to publish their work with us, become peer reviewers and join us on Advisory Board.

Know more

subsribe

For Subscribers

Subscribe to distinguished STM (scientific, technical, and medical) publisher. Subscription membership is available for individuals universities and institutions (print & online). Subscribers can access journals from our libraries, published in different formats like Printed Hardcopy, Interactive PDFs, EPUBs, eBooks, indexable documents and the author managed dynamic live web page articles, LaTeX, PDFs etc.

Know more