Newtons Dynamic Laws
Published On March 27, 2026
Journal Issue LJRS Volume 26 Issue 3

Newtons Dynamic Laws

Dr. Esmat Bekir
Dr. Esmat Bekir
Newtons Dynamic Laws
Article Fingerprint
Research ID N60GU

IntelliPaper

Abstract

“Newton’s Dynamic Laws” are concerned with the motion of bodies in orbits. Newton has published his Laws in 1684, [1], and expanded this work into later editions [2]. This work was written in Latin but it was translated in many versions in English, e.g. [3]. Because of his revolutionary ideas and his mastery of geometry, his work was not largely amenable to a great sector of scientists and physicists. Several attempts, e.g. [4]-[5] were made to simplify and clarify these laws. Modern derivations may be found in e.g. [6].

Explore Digital Article Text

I. DYNAMIC LAWS DERIVATION

This note summarizes Newton's derivation for the planetary dynamics. I have followed [5] very closely and stripped it of all historical notes for convenience. Newton's goal, in particular, was to find out the nature of the centripetal force that causes the planet to revolve around the Sun in an elliptical orbit. He argued that, without any external influence, the planet will move in straight line at constant velocity. It is this force that imparts acceleration to the body to make it adhere to orbit.

The following figure depicts the needed graphics for analysis. It looks very crowded but just in one figure it depicts all the essential parameters and the variables of our problem.

Figure 1: Based on Newton's diagram for problem 3. A planet moves in an elliptic orbit APQB about a center of force located at a focus of the ellipse.

It shows the Sun, S, resides at one focus of the ellipse. The planet P moves along the elliptical curve APQ, the tangent at P is ZPR, and the centripetal force is along PS. Newton explains that at point P, if the force vanishes, the planet will move along the tangent to R. It is the centripetal force that will move R back to Q on the ellipse.

From Galileo's experiments, a body under the influence of central force will travel a distance proportional to the acceleration times the square of the traveled time. Conversely in time, , this acceleration, is proportional to , divided by .

Meanwhile, for any centripetal force, Newton proved that the line of force sweeps equal areas in equal times. This allowed him to describe the time geometrically by an area proportional to the time. That is . Therefore, the acceleration is given by

1. Newton's lemma:

\[A = \frac {Q R}{(\delta t) ^ {2}} \propto \frac {Q R}{(S P \cdot Q T) ^ {2}} = \frac {Q R}{S P ^ {2} \cdot Q T ^ {2}}\tag{1.1}\]
\[Pollonius: Prop 15, Book1 P E = A C\tag{1.2}\]

Proof is given in Appendix A. 2. and are similar, hence

\[PX = (PE \cdot PV) / PC\] 3. Apollonius: Prop 15, Book1
\[PV = (QV^{2} \cdot PC^{2}) / (CD^{2} \cdot GV)\]

Aside from the proofs given in [7], Appendix B provides a little simple proof.

4. The shape QRPX is quadrilateral,

\[\text{☐} QRPX \Rightarrow QR = PX\tag{1.5}\]

Thus, the last four equations yield,

\[Q R = P X = (P E \cdot P V) / P C = (A C \cdot Q V ^ {2} \cdot P C) / (C D ^ {2} \cdot G V)\tag{1.6}\]

5. Apollonius: Prop 31, Book7

\[C A \cdot C B = C D \cdot P F\tag{1.7}\]

Proof is given in Appendix C. 6. and are similar, hence

\[QT / QX = PF / PE\]

Substituting from Eqs. (1.2) and (1.7) into (1.8) gives

\[\begin{array}{l} Q T / Q X = (C A \cdot C B) / (C A \cdot C D) \Rightarrow \\Q T = (Q X \cdot C B) / C D \end{array}\tag{1.9}\]

Now, Eqs. (1.6) and (1.9) yield

\[\begin{array}{r l} \frac {Q R}{Q T ^ {2}} & = (A C \cdot Q V ^ {2} \cdot P C \cdot C D ^ {2}) / (C D ^ {2} \cdot G V \cdot C B ^ {2} \cdot Q X ^ {2}) \\& = (A C / C B ^ {2}) \cdot (P C / G V) \cdot (Q V ^ {2} / Q X ^ {2}) \end{array}\tag{1.10}\]

In the limit Q approaches P. Consequently V and X will approach P. That is

\[\begin{array}{l} G V = 2 P C \\Q X = Q V \end{array}\tag{1.11}\]

Using the above equation in Eq. (1.10) gives

\[\frac {Q R}{Q T ^ {2}} = (2 / L) \cdot (1 / 2) = 1 / L\tag{1.12}\]

Here, is the latus rectum of the ellipse. Finally, Eq. (1.1) results in,

\[A = \frac {Q R}{(\delta t) ^ {2}} \propto \frac {Q R}{(S P \cdot Q T) ^ {2}} = \frac {(1 / L)}{S P ^ {2}} \propto \frac {1}{S P ^ {2}}\tag{1.13}\]

In words, the centripetal force is inversely proportional to the Sun/Planet radius squared.

Kepler's Third Law

Newton then gave a proof to Kepler's third law – the orbit's period is proportional to one and half the power of the ellipse major axis diameter. Herein, we provide a proof that is a little variant from Newton's.

Newton has shown that for any centripetal force, a planet will sweep an area proportional to time. Thus from the diagram, the area swept for the infinitesimal time, , is

\[\begin{array}{l} \text {Swept area in \delta t = SP\cdot QT\Rightarrow} \\\text {rate of Swept area = SP\cdot QT / \delta t} \end{array}\tag{1.14}\]

Since ellipse area = π · CB · AC, then the time period T is

\[T = \pi \cdot C B \cdot A C / (S P \cdot Q T / \delta t) = \pi \cdot C B \cdot A C \cdot \delta t / (S P \cdot Q T)\tag{1.15}\]

Squaring each side of Eq. (1.15) yields,

\[T ^ {2} = \pi^ {2} \cdot C B ^ {2} \cdot A C ^ {2} \cdot \delta t ^ {2} / (S P ^ {2} \cdot Q T ^ {2})\tag{1.16}\]

Substituting for QT from Eq.(1.12) into the above gives

\[T ^ {2} = \pi^ {2} \cdot C B ^ {2} \cdot A C ^ {2} \cdot \delta t ^ {2} / (S P ^ {2} \cdot L \cdot Q R)\tag{1.17}\]

Since , the above can be simplified to

\[T ^ {2} = A C ^ {3} \cdot \left[ 2 \pi^ {2} \cdot \delta t ^ {2} / (S P ^ {2} \cdot Q R) \right]\tag{1.18}\]

Equation (1.13) implies and therefore, makes (1.18)

\[T ^ {2} \propto A C ^ {3}\tag{1.19}\]

That is the orbit's period squared is proportional to the cube of the ellipse semi axis diameter.

Appendix A

Newton's Lemma

\[P E = A C\]

Proof: is the foci of the ellipse from which we draw parallel to . Ellipse reflection property, [8], states . Therefore, . Hence is equal sided triangle and .

Moreover:

\[\begin{array}{l} PH + PS = 2 AC \Rightarrow \\PI + (PI + EI + SE) = 2 PI + (EI + SE) = 2 AC \end{array}\tag{A.1}\]

Since HI parallel to RPZ and thus to DK and since SC=CH, then SE=EI. Therefore

\[2 P I + 2 E I = 2 P E = 2 A C\]

or,

\[P E = A C\tag{A.2}\]
\[\text { Appendix B }\tag{A.3}\]

Chord Bisector

Apollonius Proposition 15

The eccentric circle is that one that shares the ellipse's major axis. Herein, we project the ellipse points , , , and onto , , , and on the eccentric circle. Consequently, the lines and become two perpendicular diameters in the eccentric circle. The point on the is mapped onto on the line so that is perpendicular to the diameter , hence

\[V'P'\cdot G'V' = Q'V'^2\]

Notice that is similar to , thus

\[\frac {V P}{V ^ {\prime} P ^ {\prime}} = \frac {C P}{C P ^ {\prime}}\tag{B.1}\]

Likewise is similar to , thus

(B.2)

\[\frac {V G}{V ^ {\prime} G ^ {\prime}} = \frac {C P}{C P ^ {\prime}}\tag{B.3}\]

The above two equations give

\[\frac {V P \cdot V G}{V ^ {\prime} P ^ {\prime} \cdot V ^ {\prime} G ^ {\prime}} = \frac {C P ^ {2}}{C P ^ {2}}\tag{B.4}\]

Substituting from (B.1) yields

\[VP\cdot VG = Q'V^{2}\frac{CP^{2}}{CP^{2}}\]

Figure 2a: The diameter PG bisects the chord QQ' and DK. From Proposition 15 of Book 1 of Apollonius's Conics, the ratio of PVxVG/QV2 equals the ratio PC2/DC2.

Figure 2b: projecting the ellipse points P, Q, D, G and K onto , , , and on the eccentric circle.

What remains is to relate QV to . We know that QV is parallel to DC, so from Q we draw a parallel to PC until it meets DC in q, therefore Cq=QV. Project q onto point on , and it is straight forward to prove that . Now is similar to , Thus

\[\frac {V ^ {\prime} Q ^ {\prime}}{V Q} = \frac {C q ^ {\prime}}{C q} = \frac {C D ^ {\prime}}{C D}\tag{B.6}\]

Substituting in (B.5) results in

\[VP\cdot VG = QV^{2} \frac{CD'^{2}}{CD^{2}} \frac{CP^{2}}{CP'^{2}}\]

But implies that

\[V P \cdot V G = Q V ^ {2} \frac {C P ^ {2}}{C D ^ {2}}\tag{B.8}\]

Parallelogram area Equivalence Apollonius Proposition 31 Book 7 With reference to Fig. 3 below, we introduce two proofs.

Figure 3a: Area of parallelogram A is equal to area of parallelogram B (Proposition 31, Book 7, of the Conics of Apollonius of Perga).

Method 1: geometric algebra

Let and be the points on the eccentric circle from which their projection and on the ellipse are obtained. The coordinates of and are then given by

\[x _ {p} = x _ {1} y _ {p} = \frac {a}{b} y _ {1} = \frac {a m _ {1}}{b} x _ {1}\tag{C.1}\]

and,

\[x_{d} = x_{2} = \frac{a}{b} y_{1} = \frac{am_{1}}{b} x_{1} = y_{p} \quad y_{d} = \frac{a}{b} y_{2} = x_{1}\tag{C.2}\]

Since and then and are perpendicular and thus the area enclosed by and . Therefore the area enclosed by CP and as desired.

Method 2: vector analysis: In Fig. 3b, let P and D denote the points and respectively. The area PCD is then given by the cross product of vectors CP and CD. Thus

\[\begin{array}{r l} \left\| \begin{array}{c c} x _ {1} & x _ {2} \\y _ {1} & y _ {2} \end{array} \right\| = x _ {1} y _ {2} - x _ {2} y _ {1} & = x _ {1} \frac {b}{a} x _ {1} + \frac {a}{b} m _ {1} x _ {1} m _ {1} x _ {1} = \frac {1}{a b} x _ {1} ^ {2} (b ^ {2} + a ^ {2} m _ {1} ^ {2}) \\& = \frac {a ^ {2} b ^ {2}}{a b} = a b \end{array}\]

Figure 3b: Projecting the ellipse points P, D, G and K onto , and on the eccentric circle.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

Not applicable

Data Availability

The datasets used in this study are openly available at [repository link] and the source code is available on GitHub at [GitHub link].

Funding

This work did not receive any external funding.

References

8 Cites in Article

Cite this article

Generating citation...

Related Research

  • LCC: QA805, QA803, QB355
  • Version of record

    v1.0

  • Issue date

    27 March 2026

  • Language

    English

Newtons Dynamic Laws
Open Access
Research Article
CC-BY-NC 4.0
Views 872
Downloads 36
Special Issue

Launch a focused special issue to highlight research, emerging trends, and expert insights in your academic field.

Support