The Repercussions of the Humanitarian Intervention in the Libyan Crisis in 2011 in terms of the Responsibility to Protect

Article Fingerprint
ResearchID® NZ357

Abstract

This article aims to assess the role of Responsibility to protect based on its repercussions after its implementation in the Libyan crisis in 2011. This can be tackled by examining its legal aspect and enforcement mechanism from an offensive realism perspective. Moreover, it shows the main clarifications of the different implementation of international humanitarian law, humanitarian intervention, and responsibility to protect. The article focuses on the case of Libya as it is considered the first case for the implementation of R2P. Thus, the examination of the Libyan case can be considered for testing the results of R2P and on what bases it was implemented for instance its implementation was as a political tool to achieve the required interests and ends of the states or for the protection of human rights.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

Not applicable

Data Availability

The datasets used in this study are openly available at [repository link] and the source code is available on GitHub at [GitHub link].

Cite this article

Generating citation...

Related Research

  • Classification

    DDC Code: 341.584 LCC Code: KZ6369

  • Version of record

    v1.0

  • Issue date

    NA

  • Language

    English

Iconic historic building with domed tower in London, UK.
Open Access
Research Article
CC-BY-NC 4.0