Published On May 23, 2026
Journal Issue LJRCST Volume 26 Issue 1

A Critical Analysis of Governance Failures, Fiduciary Responsibilities, and the Path Forward

Dr. Eyong Atem
Dr. Eyong Atem
¶ ⓐ
Article Fingerprint
Research ID VYP52

Article in Press

This article is currently in the Journal Preview phase. The final published version may have formatting changes or additional corrections.

Abstract

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence into organizational decision-making has fundamentally altered how value is created, risks are managed, and authority is exercised within modern enterprises. Yet, while AI systems increasingly influence high-stakes outcomes, the governance mechanisms that oversee them have not evolved at the same pace. A critical vulnerability has emerged: executives and board members are frequently tasked with governing AI systems they do not sufficiently understand. This article argues that AI governance without executive AI literacy represents a structural governance failure rather than a technical shortcoming. The article examines how low levels of AI literacy among executives undermine strategic alignment, weaken risk oversight, and expose organizations to ethical, regulatory, and reputational harm. It demonstrates why traditional corporate governance and enterprise risk management frameworks are ill-suited to address AI-specific risks, including algorithmic bias, data misuse, opacity, and cascading system failures. Rather than positioning AI literacy as optional or advisory, the article reframes it as a fiduciary and governance imperative essential to informed oversight and responsible decision-making. To address this challenge, the article presents an integrated AI governance approach centered on executive literacy and structured around technical understanding, strategic oversight, ethical accountability, and regulatory compliance, supported by continuous learning and adaptive governance. The article concludes that organizations that embed AI literacy at the executive level are better positioned to realize AI’s benefits while mitigating its risks, whereas those that fail to do so face growing governance, performance, and legitimacy deficits in the AI era.

  • Classification

    LCC: HD30.2, JEL: M15, JEL: G30, ACM: K.4.1, ACM: K.6.0

  • Language

    en

Support