Navigating Risks: A Comprehensive Functional Hazard Assessment of eVTOL Power Battery Systems

Article Fingerprint
Research ID 10K4I

IntelliPaper

Abstract

With the advancement of the power battery and electric propulsion technology, the versatile redundancy enables the eVTOL aircraft design to be more reliable and cost-effective, thereby to be safer. This mandate the conducting of systematic aircraft level safety mitigation and comprehensive functional hazard assessment to ensure a fail-safe design, and process assurance to address the potential development errors in a pragmatic manner. After describing the application scenarios of eVTOL, the safety mitigation effects of applying
crashworthiness and ballistic rescue system (BRS) on eVTOL aircraft were analyzed and elaborated, and the flight profile of eVTOL was refined based on the aircraft level safety objectives. Utilizing the commercial aircraft system engineering approach, an aircraft level functional hierarchy was proposed for eVTOL, emphasizing completeness and correctness. Insight of the innovative features of the electric power battery system, the well-established aircraft functional hazard assessment (FHA) methodology was deployed to scrutinize the
functional inventory. Utilizing the conventional power battery system architecture found in Electric Vehicle (EV), the pertinent functions of the eVTOL's power battery system have been allocated in order to identify potential weaknesses and opportunities for improvement from a safety perspective in extant EV power battery systems. Suggestions were made after discussions that, prior to installing existing power battery systems into eVTOL aircraft applications, developers must not only enhance the availability, reliability, and safety of the battery system, but also identify and mitigate single-point failures and design errors within the extant battery system to substantiate the compliance to safety courses in airworthiness regulations.

Explore Digital Article Text

Article file ID not found.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

Not applicable

Data Availability

The datasets used in this study are openly available at [repository link] and the source code is available on GitHub at [GitHub link].

Funding

This work did not receive any external funding.

Cite this article

Generating citation...

Related Research

  • Classification

    LCC Code: TK1001-1841

  • Version of record

    v1.0

  • Issue date

    17 January 2024

  • Language

    en

Iconic historic building with domed tower in London, UK.
Open Access
Research Article
CC-BY-NC 4.0
Support