IntelliPaper
Abstract
Introduction: Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PEA) is the main method of treatment for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). The residual pulmonary hypertension (PH) after CTEPH surgical treatment is a risk factor with increasing of hospital mortality.
Objective: To analyze and evaluate the results of PEA in patients with different persistent time of medical history as a possible prognostic factor of residual PH and outcome.
Methods: Retrospective and prospective analysis of the PEA results in 87 patients operated on from April 2012 to February 2022 was conducted. The patients were divided into 3 groups. The 1st group - 45 patients with a medical history from 3 months to 1 year, the 2nd - 20 patients from 1 year to 3 years and the 3rd - 22 patients with long-term history more than 3 years.
Results: The average age of the patients was 48.7 ± 13.5 years, including 56.7 % males and 43.3 % females. Due to New York Heart Association (NYHA), 7 (8.0%) patients preoperatively belonged to class II, 60 (69.0%) to class III and 20 (23.0%) to class IV. Postoperatively the mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP mmHg) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR dyn·s·cm⁻⁵) significantly decreased in all groups (mPAP :1st group from 45±13 to 23±6, 2 nd – from 49±14 to 25±6 and 3 rd – from 58±12 to 31±7; PVR: 1st group from 797±262 to 290±135, 2 nd – from 925±383 to 376±159 and 3 rd – from 1248±332 to 505±189). Hospital mortality after PEA was 0 in patients with medical history less than 1 year, 5% from 1 to 3 years and 31% in patients with long- term anamnesis.
Conclusions: PEA is an effective surgery with mPAP and PVR decreasing in the early postoperative period. However, long-term medical history and PVR >1000 dyn·s·cm⁻⁵ are very important risk factors with increasing of hospital mortality.
Explore Digital Article Text
Article file ID not found.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
Not applicable
Data Availability
The datasets used in this study are openly available at [repository link] and the source code is available on GitHub at [GitHub link].
Funding
This work did not receive any external funding.